|
A Bangladeshinfo.com Analysis
Hardly anyone loves to show
interests about the happenings in
the political arena in today's
Bangladesh. Many understand this,
except those who are the game makers
of politics, which was once a
popular subject to talk about.
The opposition has called for
mid-term polls at the cost of ouster
of Prime Minister Khaleda Zia's
government and just enforced a
hartal. It is trying to make the
political scene hot by drumming up
the programmes, whatever it called.
The government, on the other hand,
is carrying forward a good number of
programmes - whether good or bad is
a different question. But what is
lacking is the public interest about
most of those subjects as a whole.
Why this changes have occurred? And
at a time when both the government
and the opposition, specially main
party Awami League, are throwing a
number of high-profile programmes?
Should they go without much
sensitivity and how come the
politicians do not see any
enthusiasm even among their workers
and hardcore supporters?
The last 12 years of democratic
transition saw one clear
development: what is called
bipartisanship, a scholarly concept
in the West, but a sweet experience
in a country like Bangladesh because
of misuse through politicization of
everything. Still, the devotion for
a political party is getting limited
within the sycophants.
More important feature is that the
people in general lost their
sensitivity and interest about the
programmes announced by the
politicians, be it administrative
reforms or opposition demonstration.
Some people might find it
interesting to note that hartal has
lost its relevance as a political
weapon. Simultaneously, the
opposition had long been using
boycott of parliament as another
tool, which, though did not serve
the boycotters' purpose, only made
the Parliament ineffective.
The government is talking about all
development activities and patriotic
words while the opposition had still
been giving anti-establishment
programmes. This takes a shape as if
the ruling party people, as they
feel, are the only patriotic force
while the opposition leaders and
workers are all troublemakers.
Conversely, the opposition considers
the ruling party leaders as
anti-people, declaring themselves as
the saviours of the nation.
This is a cycle through which the
government and the opposition have
been passing, sadly enough, during
the democratically elected
governments - two run by BNP and
another by Awami League. The people
had a missionary zeal against the
autocratic rule earlier, but they
now see their dreams lost in the
behaviour of the democratic
political parties.
The people, specially the conscious
segment, witnessed the political
trend closely and lost their
interests justifiably. Only those
involved are yet to realise what
they are showing to the people is an
"Old wine in new bottle".
|